Article View: net.internat
Article #261Re: Re: In search of a sane keyboard standard
From: KW Heuer
Date: Tue, 20 May 1986 16:17
Date: Tue, 20 May 1986 16:17
23 lines
1579 bytes
1579 bytes
In article <661@baylor.UUCP> baylor!peter (Peter da Silva) writes:
[An unattributed quote]:
>> The Arrow keys are in a row: UDLR. Actually, I find that
>> I can cope with this; arrangement in a diamond is not
>> essential. However, horizontal arrangement in an order other
>> that UDLR is confusing.
>
> I much prefer Left & Right to be at the extreme Left & Right
>sides of a cursor row.
For each direction x in {down, left, right, up}, I want the x-arrow key to
be at least as far in direction x as any of the other three arrow keys. For
a horizontal arrangement, this means LUDR or LDUR. (The latter is ADM-3a
style.) Similarly, there are two reasonable (to me) vertical arrangements.
I presume the reason for UDLR is to keep L and R close to each other. That
can be useful if you tend to use UD and LR separately, I guess. I suspect
the only arrangement which has a chance of satisfying a large number of
users is the diamond arrangement, or maybe the "collapsed diamond" below.
U
LDR
Karl W. Z. Heuer (ihnp4!bentley!kwh), The Walking Lint
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<841@bentley.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!topaz!bentley!kwhReferences:
<661@baylor.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!topaz!bentley!kwh From: kwh@bentley.UUCP (KW Heuer) Newsgroups: net.internat Subject: Re: Re: In search of a sane keyboard standard Message-ID: <841@bentley.UUCP> Date: Tue, 20-May-86 12:17:42 EDT Article-I.D.: bentley.841 Posted: Tue May 20 12:17:42 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 23-May-86 23:20:34 EDT References: <661@baylor.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Liberty Corner Lines: 23