🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

🏠 Home 📰 News 🗂️ Usenet Search 🔑 Login 📝 Register

Thread Tree View: net.internat

8 messages Depth: 4

[T] Back to Threads [F] Flat View [G] Group Articles

Build time: 674.59829msms | 8 messages | Max depth: 4

Thread Tree

8 nodes max depth: 4 4 leaves

Re: Are the funny letters really needed? by Barry Shein 1986-02-16 22:22 👁

Loading...
- Re: Are the funny letters really needed? by Erland Sommarskog 1986-02-18 18:39 👁
  
  Loading...
  - Re: Int'l character sets (Re: Are the funny letters really needed?) by Guy Harris 1986-02-21 20:26 👁
    
    Loading...
    - Re: Int'l character sets (Re: Are the funny letters really needed?) by Craig Wylie 1986-02-26 13:11 👁
      
      Loading...
      - Re: Int'l character sets (really sorting Chinese) by Ipse dixit 1986-02-28 16:41 👁
        
        Loading...
    - Re: Int'l character sets by Lee Dickey 1986-03-21 17:10 👁
      
      Loading...
  - Re: funny letters in funny sequences by Col. G. L. Sicherman 1986-02-24 19:05 👁
    
    Loading...
- Re: Are the funny letters really needed? by Leif Samuelsson 1986-02-19 11:13 👁
  
  Loading...

Root Message

Re: Are the funny letters really needed?

From: Barry Shein

Date: Sun, 16 Feb 1986 22:22

Article: 224

Message-ID: <172@bu-cs.UUCP>

Debug Information

Tree Statistics

Root Article: 224
Message Count: 8
Max Depth: 4
Cache Hit: No
Build Time: 674.59829ms

Thread Root

Subject: Re: Are the funny letters really needed?
From: Barry Shein
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 1986 22:22
Article: 224