🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: net.invest
Article #1069

Re: A comment on "no-load" mutual funds

#1069
From: Lawrence J. &
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 1986 02:44
28 lines
2107 bytes
>> I know of no reason whatsoever to invest in a load fund.  All the factors
>> dictate investing in a true no-load fund will be the superior investment.
>> The only people who recommend load funds are the people selling them and
>> of course they are not unbiased.  A percentage of the load that is paid
>> will go straight into their pocket in the form of commissions.
>> 
>> 				Keith Boucher HSI New Haven, CT
>
>I agree.  As a matter of fact, all Vanguard mutual fund portfolios are 
>available with no sales commissions.  (I think they mean no redemption
>fees as well when they make this statement).
>So, choosing a "group" of no-load mutual funds which you can exchange
>to/from without ever having to worry about loads makes life a little 
>easier. Then all you do is worry about individual mutual funds performance
>within that group. I'll bet you could do even better with that
>strategy than on most loaded funds.

I own/have owned several different Vanguard funds.  None of them had either
a front-end or back-end load.

Another advantage that Vanguard has is that it has comparatively low 
management fees.

The only disadvantage that I have experienced is that their service is not
so great.  But, if your management fees are low, they have to save someplace.

   ....Larry Mazlack
       mazlack@ernie.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID: <12132@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!ernie.berkeley.edu!mazlack
References: <1982@jhunix.UUCP> <317@hsi.UUCP> <9492@ucla-cs.ARPA>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!ernie.berkeley.edu!mazlack
From: mazlack@ernie.berkeley.edu.BERKELEY.EDU (Lawrence J. &)
Newsgroups: net.invest
Subject: Re: A comment on "no-load" mutual funds
Message-ID: <12132@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: Sun, 2-Mar-86 21:44:21 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.12132
Posted: Sun Mar  2 21:44:21 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 4-Mar-86 01:50:11 EST
References: <1982@jhunix.UUCP> <317@hsi.UUCP> <9492@ucla-cs.ARPA>
Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: mazlack@ernie.berkeley.edu.UUCP (Lawrence J. Mazlack)
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 28