Article View: net.invest
Article #1069Re: A comment on "no-load" mutual funds
From: Lawrence J. &
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 1986 02:44
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 1986 02:44
28 lines
2107 bytes
2107 bytes
>> I know of no reason whatsoever to invest in a load fund. All the factors
>> dictate investing in a true no-load fund will be the superior investment.
>> The only people who recommend load funds are the people selling them and
>> of course they are not unbiased. A percentage of the load that is paid
>> will go straight into their pocket in the form of commissions.
>>
>> Keith Boucher HSI New Haven, CT
>
>I agree. As a matter of fact, all Vanguard mutual fund portfolios are
>available with no sales commissions. (I think they mean no redemption
>fees as well when they make this statement).
>So, choosing a "group" of no-load mutual funds which you can exchange
>to/from without ever having to worry about loads makes life a little
>easier. Then all you do is worry about individual mutual funds performance
>within that group. I'll bet you could do even better with that
>strategy than on most loaded funds.
I own/have owned several different Vanguard funds. None of them had either
a front-end or back-end load.
Another advantage that Vanguard has is that it has comparatively low
management fees.
The only disadvantage that I have experienced is that their service is not
so great. But, if your management fees are low, they have to save someplace.
....Larry Mazlack
mazlack@ernie.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<12132@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!ernie.berkeley.edu!mazlackReferences:
<1982@jhunix.UUCP> <317@hsi.UUCP> <9492@ucla-cs.ARPA>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!ernie.berkeley.edu!mazlack From: mazlack@ernie.berkeley.edu.BERKELEY.EDU (Lawrence J. &) Newsgroups: net.invest Subject: Re: A comment on "no-load" mutual funds Message-ID: <12132@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: Sun, 2-Mar-86 21:44:21 EST Article-I.D.: ucbvax.12132 Posted: Sun Mar 2 21:44:21 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 4-Mar-86 01:50:11 EST References: <1982@jhunix.UUCP> <317@hsi.UUCP> <9492@ucla-cs.ARPA> Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: mazlack@ernie.berkeley.edu.UUCP (Lawrence J. Mazlack) Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 28