Article View: net.lan
Article #1014Re: CCITT networking for (BSD) UNIX
From: Rob Frye
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 1986 15:04
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 1986 15:04
55 lines
3105 bytes
3105 bytes
[The original article to which I'm replying came from net.lan. I'm
reposting the questions that article asked.]
Philip Prindeville writes:
> I haven't heard much about CCITT protocols getting much acceptance
> in UNIX circles lately, with the exception of the EAN message
> system from the University of British Columbia C.S. Department.
> It has been installed at several sites, and is available for a
> reasonable fee.
> (1) Does anyone in net-land know of an implementation of
> CCITT protocols (X.25 for [say] a DMF-32 as a network
> interface, or X.224/X.225 network/transport socket code,
> or an X.410 (et. al.) mailer)?
X.25 has been implemented on various machines under Unix, Xenix, etc.
Some companies offering such that come to mind are TITN, Systech,
MorningStar, Gateway/Source, The Software Group, and XDot. I'm sure
there are others, but these are the ones I've found have more than
vaporware.
** Begin Product Non-Announcement **
I don't know if anyone has X.224/X.225 available commercially. We
will be building it into our Electronic Image Transmission products;
currently we use T.70/T.62 which are also CCITT protocols (and are
subsets of the full X.224/5) geared towards document/teletext/facsimile
usage. We run X.410 and X.411 P1 on top of all that. I don't think
there are any plans to sell just the comm software, but the whole
product complete...
** End Product Non-Announcement **
I know that AT&T Bell Labs folks are interested in this and there has
been much discussion in the net.mail* newsgroups about uucp, RFC, X.400
and ARPA domains and how in the hell they all fit together. Comments?
> (2) If yes, how is it and are sources available?
??? Anyone with any such products want to say?
> (3) Is there enough interest on the net to start a group
> specifically about CCITT/ISO standards and their
> implementations? (Hallo Europe? Canada?)
I would like to start a group for that, but isn't net.dcom the right
place for that? (And of course net.news.group for the proposal.)
> I had heard that the Swedish PTT (Post, Telegraph & Telephone) had
> implemented it, but I thought that was heresay.
The German PTT (Deutches Bundespost) has an X.400 system operating
today, tho I don't know any more than that. KDD (Japan) has
interconnected with Univ of British Columbia in their X.400 mail system.
--
--->
--
"You can Telenet, but you can't tell it much."
Rob Frye, NetExpress Inc.
{seismo,rlgvax}!hadron!{netex,netexa}!rfrye
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<436@netexa.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!decvax!bellcore!petrus!scherzo!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!rlgvax!hadron!netexa!rfryeReferences:
<123@mit-trillian.MIT.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!decvax!bellcore!petrus!scherzo!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!rlgvax!hadron!netexa!rfrye From: rfrye@netexa.UUCP (Rob Frye) Newsgroups: net.lan,net.mail,net.dcom Subject: Re: CCITT networking for (BSD) UNIX Message-ID: <436@netexa.UUCP> Date: Wed, 19-Mar-86 10:04:09 EST Article-I.D.: netexa.436 Posted: Wed Mar 19 10:04:09 1986 Date-Received: Sun, 30-Mar-86 07:27:02 EST References: <123@mit-trillian.MIT.EDU> Organization: NetExpress, Inc., Vienna, VA Lines: 55