Re: Advice sought on VAX UNIX Ethernet/TCP-IP

Article View: net.lan

Article #1193

#1193

From: System Mangler
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1986 10:32

14 lines
1193 bytes

In article <452@brl-sem.ARPA>, ron@brl-sem.ARPA (Ron Natalie <ron>) writes:
> My personal favorite is the Interlan NI1010A board.  Very reliable.
> and small (one hex module).

Ours too.  Never any problems, even on the IBM 4341's DACU Unibus.

I could take or leave their transceivers though.  Especially the 802.3
variety, which don't work on our Ethernets.

The 3com board draws less power (only 4 amps), but its overhead is a
lot higher.  They're finicky about what transceivers they connect to.
Not recommended.

Don Speck   speck@vlsi.caltech.edu  seismo!cit-vax!speck

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1076@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!nike!cit-vax!mangler

References: <223@rabbit1.UUCP> <452@brl-sem.ARPA>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!nike!cit-vax!mangler
From: mangler@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu (System Mangler)
Newsgroups: net.lan
Subject: Re: Advice sought on VAX UNIX Ethernet/TCP-IP
Message-ID: <1076@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu>
Date: Sun, 26-Oct-86 05:32:39 EST
Article-I.D.: cit-vax.1076
Posted: Sun Oct 26 05:32:39 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 27-Oct-86 01:21:47 EST
References: <223@rabbit1.UUCP> <452@brl-sem.ARPA>
Distribution: net
Organization: California Institute of Technology
Lines: 14
Summary: Interlan NI1010A vs. their transceivers

Reply to Parent Message