🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: net.lan
Article #812

Multi-site TCP/IP

#812
From: Richard Gopstein
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 1985 17:40
29 lines
1594 bytes
  We (at RCA) are interested in networking several remote sites
together.  The machines involved will be a mixture of VAX/VMS
systems and UNIX (and unix-like) workstations.  We are currently
planning on buying Wollongong software at each site to use over
local ethernets, and connecting the seperate ethernets together
using something connected to 56KB lines.  The question is whether
this makes sense in general, and specifically what to use to
"connect" these seperate ethernets.

  As far as I know, there are three options:

    1) Use exising VAXes with Wollongong software to do the TCP/IP
	routing themselves over the phone lines.

    2) Use a dedicated TCP/IP gateway (Bridge Communications?)

    3) Use an ethernet packet gateway (Vitalink?)

Can anyone make a recommendation or alternate suggestion?
What is the consensus about the performance/reliability
of the Wollongong software?  Thanks.


Rich Gopstein
RCA

uucp:   ...{harvard, seismo, ut-sally, sri-iu, ihnp4!packard}!topaz!gopstein
arpa:   GOPSTEIN@RUTGERS
Technical Details
Message-ID: <2761@topaz.ARPA>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!columbia!topaz!gopstein

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site topaz.ARPA
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!columbia!topaz!gopstein
From: gopstein@topaz.ARPA (Richard Gopstein)
Newsgroups: net.lan
Subject: Multi-site TCP/IP
Message-ID: <2761@topaz.ARPA>
Date: Wed, 17-Jul-85 13:40:06 EDT
Article-I.D.: topaz.2761
Posted: Wed Jul 17 13:40:06 1985
Date-Received: Sat, 20-Jul-85 06:14:36 EDT
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 29
Keywords: tcp/ip