Re: are inlines static?

Article View: net.lang.c++

Article #137

#137

From: nathan
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 1986 23:54

14 lines
1070 bytes

static inlines:

alice!ark claims that "inline" routines are not implicitly
static, unless declared otherwise.  He/she may be right, in
the case of the existing compiler, but Rich Wales is right "by the
book".

Read section r8.1 more closely: *everything* at the
top level is static unless declared otherwise.  Doesn't the
existing compiler follow this?

Nathan C. Myers
	Address: hplabs!hp-pcd!orstcs!nathan OR	nathan@oregon-state
	Quote: "Laugh-a while you can-a, Monkey-boy" -- John Whorfin

Technical Details

Message-ID: <34200014@orstcs.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!decvax!hplabs!hp-pcd!orstcs!nathan

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: notesfiles
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!decvax!hplabs!hp-pcd!orstcs!nathan
From: nathan@orstcs.UUCP (nathan)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c++
Subject: Re: are inlines static?
Message-ID: <34200014@orstcs.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 2-Apr-86 18:54:00 EST
Article-I.D.: orstcs.34200014
Posted: Wed Apr  2 18:54:00 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 5-Apr-86 08:02:59 EST
Organization: Oregon State University - Corvallis, OR
Lines: 14
Nf-ID: #N:orstcs:34200014:000:494
Nf-From: orstcs!nathan    Apr  2 15:54:00 1986