Article View: net.lang.c++
Article #369I think our compiler is far too old ... (yes)
From: Bjarne Stroustrup
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1986 14:54
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1986 14:54
9 lines
935 bytes
935 bytes
Subject: I think our compiler is far too old ...... > Larry Cable, Ultrix Eng Group, REO2-F/M8 x6149 @ Digital Equipment Corporation) > > We have just put a a version of C++, (release E Nov 84) > ... can anyone confirm my suspicions that our compiler is so old that > it doesnt actullay support C++ as defined in the book?? Confirmed. The current release is release 1.1 from June '86. Avoid earlier versions (Release E Nov '84 and release 1.0 Aug '85) if you can.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6205@alice.uUCp>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!princeton!allegra!alice!bsShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!rutgers!princeton!allegra!alice!bs From: bs@alice.UucP (Bjarne Stroustrup) Newsgroups: net.lang.c++ Subject: I think our compiler is far too old ... (yes) Message-ID: <6205@alice.uUCp> Date: Fri, 24-Oct-86 10:54:33 EDT Article-I.D.: alice.6205 Posted: Fri Oct 24 10:54:33 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 25-Oct-86 06:16:09 EDT Organization: Bell Labs, Murray Hill Lines: 9