Article View: net.lang.c++
Article #43Re: the C++ scope operator
From: Mark Weiser
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 1986 04:01
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 1986 04:01
15 lines
1260 bytes
1260 bytes
In article <54@cecil.UUCP> keith@cecil.UUCP writes:
>
>Bye-bye efficiency -- not to mention comprehensibility! It's not
>worth it! Maybe in a special dialect called C++Flavors.
I don't agree. There should be absolutely no efficiency loss,
and the comprehensibility is much better in some cases because
of better modularity and code reusability. Naturally any new feature
provides a new way to write bad code, but that is not a fair attack.
So did the old features.
-mark
--
Spoken: Mark Weiser ARPA: mark@maryland Phone: +1-301-454-7817
CSNet: mark@umcp-cs UUCP: {seismo,allegra}!umcp-cs!mark
USPS: Computer Science Dept., University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3413@umcp-cs.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!gatech!seismo!umcp-cs!markReferences:
<4438@think.ARPA> <54@cecil.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!gatech!seismo!umcp-cs!mark From: mark@umcp-cs.UUCP (Mark Weiser) Newsgroups: net.lang.c++ Subject: Re: the C++ scope operator Message-ID: <3413@umcp-cs.UUCP> Date: Fri, 28-Feb-86 23:01:49 EST Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.3413 Posted: Fri Feb 28 23:01:49 1986 Date-Received: Sun, 2-Mar-86 02:25:17 EST References: <4438@think.ARPA> <54@cecil.UUCP> Reply-To: mark@maryland.UUCP (Mark Weiser) Organization: U of Maryland, Computer Science Dept., College Park, MD Lines: 15