Re: C Coding Question

Article View: net.lang.c

Article #9162

#9162

From: Mike McNamara
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1986 03:09

14 lines
1161 bytes

In article <248@killer.UUCP> tad@killer.UUCP writes:
> Should say() be declared void, or is there some sort of 
> error checking I should implement?  

Progammer's Maxim # 17 :
Never test for an error condition if you don't know what to do with it.


-- 
---------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
| Michael Mc Namara              | Let the words by yours, I'm done with mine.
| UUCP: dual!vecpyr!tflop!mac    | May your life proceed by its own design.
| ARPA: tflop!mac@ames.arpa      |
---------------------------------+--------------------------------------------

Technical Details

Message-ID: <292@tflop.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!vecpyr!tflop!mac

References: <248@killer.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!vecpyr!tflop!mac
From: mac@tflop.UUCP (Mike McNamara)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: C Coding Question
Message-ID: <292@tflop.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 19-Aug-86 23:09:16 EDT
Article-I.D.: tflop.292
Posted: Tue Aug 19 23:09:16 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 20-Aug-86 23:21:29 EDT
References: <248@killer.UUCP>
Reply-To: mac@tflop.UUCP (Mike McNamara)
Organization: ESL, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA.
Lines: 14
Keywords: Attention all nit-pickers...

Reply to Parent Message