Re: C Coding Question

Article View: net.lang.c

Article #9192

#9192

From: Tad Marko
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 1986 03:13

25 lines
1119 bytes

In my original article, I wasn't asking if this was legal:

char **thing = {"stuff","and more stuff"};

I was asking if I should use 

foo(parm)
char **parm;
{...}

or

foo(parm)
char *parm[];
{...}

and I *DID* test both of them, and they both worked.

C'mon, give me at least a *little* credit...sheeeesh!

--
Tad Marko
..!ihnp4!killer!tad		||	..!ihnp4!alamo!infoswx!ntvax!tad
UNIX Connection BBS AT&T 3B2		North Texas State U. VAX 11/780
flames to:  /dev/your_ear

Technical Details

Message-ID: <262@killer.UUCP>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!caip!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!cuae2!ltuxa!we53!sw013b!dj3b1!killer!tad

References: <248@killer.UUCP> <138@darth.UUCP> <2973@umcp-cs.UUCP> <525@dg_rtp.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!caip!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!ihnp4!cuae2!ltuxa!we53!sw013b!dj3b1!killer!tad
From: tad@killer.UUCP (Tad Marko)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: C Coding Question
Message-ID: <262@killer.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 22-Aug-86 23:13:05 EDT
Article-I.D.: killer.262
Posted: Fri Aug 22 23:13:05 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 24-Aug-86 05:07:34 EDT
References: <248@killer.UUCP> <138@darth.UUCP> <2973@umcp-cs.UUCP> <525@dg_rtp.UUCP>
Organization: The Unix(tm) Connection BBS, Dallas, Tx
Lines: 25
Summary: pay attention before you flame

Reply to Parent Message