Re: Another stupid language proposal

Article View: net.lang.c

Article #9222

#9222

From: karl
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 1986 21:19

10 lines
954 bytes

rbbb@rice.ARPA writes:
>[ proposal for valof/resultis a la BCPL ]
>I also realize that this is a bit of a hefty feature to go proposing for
>ANSI C, so I am just asking people to think about it.

I don't think it'll ever be added to C.  The inline function, which has about
as much power, is a less drastic change and is syntactically neater.

Karl W. Z. Heuer (ima!haddock!karl, karl@haddock.isc.com), The Walking Lint

Technical Details

Message-ID: <86900029@haddock>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!think!ima!haddock!karl

References: <3129@brl-smoke.ARPA>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!think!ima!haddock!karl
From: karl@haddock
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: Another stupid language proposal
Message-ID: <86900029@haddock>
Date: Sat, 30-Aug-86 17:19:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: haddock.86900029
Posted: Sat Aug 30 17:19:00 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 2-Sep-86 21:06:44 EDT
References: <3129@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Lines: 10
Nf-ID: #R:brl-smoke.ARPA:3129:haddock:86900029:000:420
Nf-From: haddock!karl    Aug 30 17:19:00 1986

Reply to Parent Message