Article View: net.lang.c
Article #9416expression sequencing bugs
From: C90630JG%WUVMD.BITNET
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 1986 05:53
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 1986 05:53
21 lines
1354 bytes
1354 bytes
In article <760@oakhill.UUCP> tomc@oakhill.UUCP (Tom Cunningham) writes: > /* a = b + b + b */ > a = ((b=1),b) + ((b=2),b) + ((b=3),b) > >I expected the result to be 6. With the Microsoft C compiler and the >compiler on the Sun 3, the result is 9. Apparently the parenthetical >assignments are all getting done before the comma and addition. Any >thoughts on this? > Tom, I agree, the result should be 6, as defined by K&R, but I have tried it on ...................... I would like everyone to test it on as many machines as prossible, to see if we can find as least ONE other besides Small-C, that works. Mike Stump ucbvax!hplabs!csun!csunb!beusemrs I would like to report that the Computer Innovations C86 C complier on the IBM-PC produces the correct answer. Jonathen Goldberg c90630jg@wuvmd.bitnet
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4197@brl-smoke.ARPA>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ihnp4!qantel!lll-lcc!lll-crg!seismo!columbia!caip!brl-adm!brl-smoke!smoke!C90630JG%WUVMD.BITNET@wiscvm.ARPAShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbatt!ihnp4!qantel!lll-lcc!lll-crg!seismo!columbia!caip!brl-adm!brl-smoke!smoke!C90630JG%WUVMD.BITNET@wiscvm.ARPA From: C90630JG%WUVMD.BITNET@wiscvm.ARPA Newsgroups: net.lang.c Subject: expression sequencing bugs Message-ID: <4197@brl-smoke.ARPA> Date: Sat, 27-Sep-86 01:53:24 EDT Article-I.D.: brl-smok.4197 Posted: Sat Sep 27 01:53:24 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 30-Sep-86 08:26:36 EDT Sender: news@brl-smoke.ARPA Lines: 21