Re: Using SCANF with DOUBLE precisi

Article View: net.lang.c

Article #9439

#9439

From: karl
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1986 15:19

9 lines
924 bytes

orion!vaughan writes:
>After having my code bomb several times (unfortunately, I was not as lucky
>as you - instead of zeroes, I got core dumps), I discovered this ...

That's unlucky?  I'd rather get a core dump (which tends to point right at
the error) than the wrong answer (which may not become visible for a while).

Karl W. Z. Heuer (ima!haddock!karl or karl@haddock.isc.com), The Walking Lint

Technical Details

Message-ID: <86900068@haddock>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!think!ima!haddock!karl

References: <22@orion.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!think!ima!haddock!karl
From: karl@haddock
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: Using SCANF with DOUBLE precisi
Message-ID: <86900068@haddock>
Date: Tue, 30-Sep-86 11:19:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: haddock.86900068
Posted: Tue Sep 30 11:19:00 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 1-Oct-86 06:18:52 EDT
References: <22@orion.UUCP>
Lines: 9
Nf-ID: #R:orion.UUCP:22:haddock:86900068:000:400
Nf-From: haddock!karl    Sep 30 11:19:00 1986

Reply to Parent Message