Article View: net.lang.c
Article #9545Expression sequencing/\"standards\"
From: David Chase
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1986 23:01
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1986 23:01
8 lines
825 bytes
825 bytes
> I find that the Three Holy Documents of C (K&R, H&S, the draft ANSI > standard) are a little muddy on this point, though I agree with Fabbian. If the "standard language definition" is ambiguous, then it isn't a definition. Have them clean up the definition. In this case, having an answer is much more important than which answer you have. David
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4527@brl-smoke.ARPA>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!rutgers!caip!brl-adm!brl-smoke!smoke!rbbb@rice.eduShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!rutgers!caip!brl-adm!brl-smoke!smoke!rbbb@rice.edu From: rbbb@rice.edu (David Chase) Newsgroups: net.lang.c Subject: Expression sequencing/\"standards\" Message-ID: <4527@brl-smoke.ARPA> Date: Fri, 10-Oct-86 19:01:45 EDT Article-I.D.: brl-smok.4527 Posted: Fri Oct 10 19:01:45 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 11-Oct-86 21:11:25 EDT Sender: news@brl-smoke.ARPA Lines: 8