Re: is (b=1)+(b=2) as dangerous a usage as ((b=1),b)+((b=2),b) ?

Article View: net.lang.c

Article #9578

#9578

From: Frank Adams
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 1986 15:41

10 lines
1046 bytes

While we're at, people might try a = ((b=1)*1) + ((b=2)*1) + ((b=5)*1);

This is no more guaranteed to work than the other variations which have been
given, but I suspect that it has a better actual success rate.

You won't see any of these things in any code I write.

Frank Adams                           ihnp4!philabs!pwa-b!mmintl!franka
Multimate International    52 Oakland Ave North    E. Hartford, CT 06108

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1868@mmintl.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!nike!ll-xn!adelie!axiom!linus!philabs!pwa-b!mmintl!franka

References: <472@jc3b21.UUCP> <621@dg_rtp.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!nike!ll-xn!adelie!axiom!linus!philabs!pwa-b!mmintl!franka
From: franka@mmintl.UUCP (Frank Adams)
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: is (b=1)+(b=2) as dangerous a usage as ((b=1),b)+((b=2),b) ?
Message-ID: <1868@mmintl.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 9-Oct-86 11:41:01 EDT
Article-I.D.: mmintl.1868
Posted: Thu Oct  9 11:41:01 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 17-Oct-86 03:31:32 EDT
References: <472@jc3b21.UUCP> <621@dg_rtp.UUCP>
Reply-To: franka@mmintl.UUCP (Frank Adams)
Organization: Multimate International, E. Hartford, CT
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message