Article View: net.lang.c
Article #9638Re: sbrk() and brk()
From: martin
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1986 18:34
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1986 18:34
15 lines
989 bytes
989 bytes
In regards to your posting about finding problems with the way that Xenix performs it's sbrk and brk, I have this to say... Xenix 5.0 from microsoft is only Unix 5.0 compatible. They do not guarantee 100% compatibility. It is not a validated port. So the way that they implement these routines is up to them. -- <============================================== martin wilde omssw2!martin Of course the usual disclaimer applies. ===============================================>
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<510@omssw2.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!think!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!tektronix!reed!omssw2!martinShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!think!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!tektronix!reed!omssw2!martin From: martin@omssw2.UUCP Newsgroups: net.lang.c Subject: Re: sbrk() and brk() Message-ID: <510@omssw2.UUCP> Date: Wed, 22-Oct-86 14:34:36 EDT Article-I.D.: omssw2.510 Posted: Wed Oct 22 14:34:36 1986 Date-Received: Thu, 23-Oct-86 18:49:30 EDT Distribution: net Organization: Intel Corp., OMS Div., Systems Group, Hillsboro, OR Lines: 15