🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <115@sdcsmb.UUCP>, pmontgom@sdcsmb.UUCP (Peter Montgomery) writes:
>In article <247@xanth.UUCP> tadguy@xanth.UUCP (Tad Guy) writes:
>>>The f77 compiler complains of a syntax error at the first line of the
>>>following program (4.2bsd on VAX, v2.0 on SUN):
>>>      write(6,10) (-1)
>>>10    format(i2)
>>>      end
>>I haven't found a fortran compiler yet that will accept that line.
>
>        Both the Control Data FTN 4 (1966 plus extensions, such as
>expressions in iolists) and FTN 5 (1977) compilers accept the construct.
>        The WRITE statement corresponds to FORTRAN 77.  The FORMAT should
>be changed to (i3) or (1x,i2), since FORTRAN 77 does not permit a "-" as a
>carriage control.
>                        Peter Montgomery

I think the f77 compiler is expecting an implied DO and then barfing when it
doesn't get one.  VMS Fortran swallows this OK.  If the write is changed to
something like

      write(6,10) (-1,i=1,1)

f77 is happy.

But yes it is a bug.

My favorite I/O bug is

      character*10 buf
      integer num
      buf = '12'
      read(buf,'(I2)',err=20) num
      write(6,*)num
      stop
20    write(6,*)'Error!',num
      stop
      end

The output will be

Error! 12

[can anybody figure out WHY, and/or suggest a patch?  Oh yes, if you do

      read(buf,'(I2)',iostat=i) num

you get a core dump.  Both Berkeley and AT&T Unix f77's are guilty of this.
If the formatted I/O is done from a file it works fine; only with internal
I/O it seems to barf.]
-- 
 -------------------------------    Disclaimer:  The views contained herein are
|       dan levy | yvel nad      |  my own and are not at all those of my em-
|         an engihacker @        |  ployer or the administrator of any computer
| at&t computer systems division |  upon which I may hack.
|        skokie, illinois        |
 --------------------------------   Path: ..!ihnp4!ttrdc!levy