Article View: net.lang.f77
Article #317Rotten error message
From: T.R.Hopkins
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1986 00:40
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1986 00:40
32 lines
1218 bytes
1218 bytes
We have made a lot of changes to our f77 compiler over the last year
or so. Would somebody like to run the small program below and let
me know if they get a
`compiler error illegal tag 0'
error message? Or have we screwed up an edit somewhere.
The program is actually illegal - I think a good compiler should
pick up the illegal redefinition of MAXLEN as a constant.
Thanks,
Tim Hopkins,
Computing Laboratory,
University of Kent,
Canterbury CT2 7NF
Kent
U.K.
{ trh@ukc.UUCP
trh%ukc@ucl-cs.ARPA
na.hopkins@su-score.ARPA }
c===================================
SUBROUTINE FRED(MAXLEN)
INTEGER MAXLEN
PARAMETER (MAXLEN=123)
CALL JOE(MAXLEN)
END
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<753@eagle.ukc.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!pyramid!ut-sally!seismo!mcvax!ukc!trhShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!pyramid!ut-sally!seismo!mcvax!ukc!trh From: trh@ukc.ac.uk (T.R.Hopkins) Newsgroups: net.lang.f77 Subject: Rotten error message Message-ID: <753@eagle.ukc.ac.uk> Date: Tue, 11-Feb-86 19:40:19 EST Article-I.D.: eagle.753 Posted: Tue Feb 11 19:40:19 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 14-Feb-86 03:33:51 EST Organization: U of Kent at Canterbury, Canterbury, UK Lines: 32