Re: INTEGER*2 in f77

Article View: net.lang.f77

Article #394

#394

From: Steve Schlaifer x43171 156/224
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1986 18:56

14 lines
1115 bytes

In article <18@amdimage.UUCP>, cmoore@amdimage.UUCP (chris moore) writes:
> [ summary: IBM/PC Fortran doesn't allow -32768 in INTEGER*2.  Is this
>            standard? ]

There is no INTEGER*2 in the ANSI standard for Fortran '77.  This is a
vendor extension to the language.  Unfortunately, it sounds like they
didn't do a very good job.
-- 

...smeagol\			Steve Schlaifer
......wlbr->!jplgodo!steve	Advance Projects Group, Jet Propulsion Labs
....logico/			4800 Oak Grove Drive, M/S 156/204
				Pasadena, California, 91109
					+1 818 354 3171

Technical Details

Message-ID: <818@jplgodo.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!ut-sally!seismo!nbires!hao!hplabs!felix!scgvaxd!wlbr!jplgodo!steve

References: <18@amdimage.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!ut-sally!seismo!nbires!hao!hplabs!felix!scgvaxd!wlbr!jplgodo!steve
From: steve@jplgodo.UUCP (Steve Schlaifer x43171 156/224)
Newsgroups: net.lang.f77
Subject: Re: INTEGER*2 in f77
Message-ID: <818@jplgodo.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 30-Jun-86 14:56:17 EDT
Article-I.D.: jplgodo.818
Posted: Mon Jun 30 14:56:17 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 3-Jul-86 00:47:44 EDT
References: <18@amdimage.UUCP>
Distribution: net
Organization: Jet Propulsion Labs, Pasadena, CA
Lines: 14

Reply to Parent Message