a bad implementation of f77

Article View: net.lang.f77

Article #410

#410

From: W. Thomas McCollough Jr.
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1986 03:12

7 lines
725 bytes

How many bugs may a Fortran 77 compiler have before it can no longer be
called 'Fortran 77'?  Is there any such legal notion associated with an
ANSI standard?  I would appreciate references to published material
that answers this question.

Thanks,
Tom McCollough

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1801@utah-gr.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!ut-sally!utah-cs!utah-gr!wtm

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!ut-sally!utah-cs!utah-gr!wtm
From: wtm@utah-gr.UUCP (W. Thomas McCollough Jr.)
Newsgroups: net.lang.f77
Subject: a bad implementation of f77
Message-ID: <1801@utah-gr.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 18-Sep-86 23:12:33 EDT
Article-I.D.: utah-gr.1801
Posted: Thu Sep 18 23:12:33 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 20-Sep-86 00:15:45 EDT
Organization: University of Utah CS Dept
Lines: 7