Thread View: net.lang.forth
2 messages
2 total messages
Started by Alex Colvin
Sun, 26 Aug 1984 17:12
questionable
Author: Alex Colvin
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 1984 17:12
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 1984 17:12
5 lines
771 bytes
771 bytes
(cvl.1337) states that Forth Inc. has produced an Ada compiler in Forth. This I very much doubt. Anyone can produce an Ada compiler for the subset of their choice. This claim sounds like more Forth hype of the "Forth is faster than assembly language" strain. Tell me more about this Ada compiler.
Re: questionable
Author: wolpert
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 1984 01:24
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 1984 01:24
14 lines
1345 bytes
1345 bytes
/***** hpisla:net.lang.forth / dartvax!alexc / 11:12 am Aug 26, 1984*/ (cvl.1337) states that Forth Inc. has produced an Ada compiler in Forth. This I very much doubt. Anyone can produce an Ada compiler for the subset of their choice. This claim sounds like more Forth hype of the "Forth is faster than assembly language" strain. Tell me more about this Ada compiler. /* ---------- */ "Ada* subset" is a contradiction. Either a specific compiler is a full, validated Ada*...or it is not Ada* at all. Tight control over the standard may be the *only* good thing about this language. * Ada is a registered trade mark of the US Department of Defense
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads