Re: Spice Lisp (and more Common Lisp arguments)

Article View: net.lang.lisp

Article #611

#611

From: Jim Kempf
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 1986 14:30

7 lines
943 bytes

In article <1022@spice.cs.cmu.edu>, djz@spice.cs.cmu.edu (Daniel Zigmond) writes:
> OK, Mr. Jacobs, so what's wrong with Spice Lisp?  Why do you keep emphasizing

Well, for one thing, some of the functions are pages and pages long.
An example is the AREF function. It runs to about 20 pages! From
the software engineering point of view, this is NOT the ideal situation.
		Jim Kempf	hplabs!kempf

Technical Details

Message-ID: <334@hplabsc.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!ut-sally!pyramid!hplabs!hplabsc!kempf

References: <1022@spice.cs.cmu.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!ut-sally!pyramid!hplabs!hplabsc!kempf
From: kempf@hplabsc.UUCP (Jim Kempf)
Newsgroups: net.lang.lisp
Subject: Re: Spice Lisp (and more Common Lisp arguments)
Message-ID: <334@hplabsc.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 27-Jun-86 10:30:41 EDT
Article-I.D.: hplabsc.334
Posted: Fri Jun 27 10:30:41 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 28-Jun-86 07:01:34 EDT
References: <1022@spice.cs.cmu.edu>
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Laboratories
Lines: 7
Summary: Loooong functions

Reply to Parent Message