How about CommonLisp on 80386 machines

Article View: net.lang.lisp

Article #702

#702

From: Jeff Kitson
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 1986 23:52

14 lines
1034 bytes

What is the state of CommonLisp on 80386 based machines, such as
the Compaq 386.  It seems as though this machine could be reasonable
for lisp.  Has anyone looked into this possibility?  If so, the questions
that I have are:

Is there a virtual memory operating system that will support large programs?

How good are the CommonLisp implementation available?

Thanks in advance for any info anyone can pass along, I will summarize
the info I get,  -Jeff

-- 
Jeff Kitson                 jeff@kestrel.arpa

Technical Details

Message-ID: <13108@kestrel.ARPA>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!nike!sri-spam!sri-unix!hplabs!pesnta!amd!amdcad!decwrl!glacier!kestrel!jeff

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!seismo!lll-crg!nike!sri-spam!sri-unix!hplabs!pesnta!amd!amdcad!decwrl!glacier!kestrel!jeff
From: jeff@kestrel.ARPA (Jeff Kitson)
Newsgroups: net.lang.lisp
Subject: How about CommonLisp on 80386 machines
Message-ID: <13108@kestrel.ARPA>
Date: Fri, 3-Oct-86 19:52:41 EDT
Article-I.D.: kestrel.13108
Posted: Fri Oct  3 19:52:41 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 6-Oct-86 18:36:06 EDT
Organization: Kestrel Institute, Palo Alto, CA
Lines: 14