Re: Rate different versions of CP/M Pasc - (nf) - Article 2 - go-pugleaf

Article View: net.lang.pasca

Article #2

Re: Rate different versions of CP/M Pasc - (nf)

From: utzoodecvaxharpoihnp4ixn5cinuxcp...
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1982 12:27

17 lines
941 bytes

#R:linus:-18600:uiucdcs:27900002:000:460
uiucdcs!schultz    Nov 30 10:05:00 1982








......and.. see the March 1982 issue of BYTE for a pretty good review of
4 Pascals: Pascal/M, Pascal/Z, Pascal MT+, and UCSD Pascal.  The reviewers
did not come to any conclusions about which implementation is "best", but
they discuss many of the differences and features of each product and they
provide the results of a series of benchmark tests that are of interest to
most users.  I'd recommend careful reading of the review before buying
anything.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <bnews.uiucdcs.1147>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

From: utzoo!decvax!harpo!ihnp4!ixn5c!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!schultz
Newsgroups: net.lang.pasca
Title: Re: Rate different versions of CP/M Pasc - (nf)
Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.1147
Posted: Tue Nov 30 12:27:17 1982
Received: Sat Dec  4 04:17:47 1982
Subject: Re: Rate different versions of CP/M Pasc - (nf)
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 1982 12:27:17 +0000
Message-ID: <bnews.uiucdcs.1147>