Re: optimizing compilers vs. optimizing programmers

Article View: net.lang.pascal

Article #128

#128

From: Marty Sasaki
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 1985 22:32

21 lines
1587 bytes

> In the end, VMS got written mostly in assembler anyway (unless they have
> gone and re-coded later version, which I doubt, but stranger things
> have happened). I have it from several sources that the reason this
> happened was because a certain prominent DEC individual decided that
> no compiler could write code as good as his assembler (ie it wouldn't
> be fast enough). So much for consistency...
> 
> Laura Creighton
> utzoo!laura

VMS version 1 was written mostly in assembler. Parts of version 2 got
rewritten in Bliss. The most notable of the rewrites was the file system
ACP (the thing that converts file names into physical disk block numbers).
Andy Goldstein rewrote it in Bliss and carefully wrote some of the routines
in assembler to compare against the Bliss. The Bliss generated code was
smaller.
-- 
			Marty Sasaki
			Havard University Science Center
			sasaki@harvard.{arpa,uucp}
			617-495-1270

Technical Details

Message-ID: <297@harvard.ARPA>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!teddy!panda!talcott!harvard!sasaki

References: <285@harvard.ARPA> <4922@utzoo.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site harvard.ARPA
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!teddy!panda!talcott!harvard!sasaki
From: sasaki@harvard.ARPA (Marty Sasaki)
Newsgroups: net.lang.pascal,net.lang.c
Subject: Re: optimizing compilers vs. optimizing programmers
Message-ID: <297@harvard.ARPA>
Date: Wed, 16-Jan-85 17:32:26 EST
Article-I.D.: harvard.297
Posted: Wed Jan 16 17:32:26 1985
Date-Received: Thu, 17-Jan-85 14:04:05 EST
References: <285@harvard.ARPA> <4922@utzoo.UUCP>
Organization: Aiken Computation Laboratory, Harvard
Lines: 21

Reply to Parent Message