Re: optimizing compilers vs. optimizing programmers

Article View: net.lang.pascal

Article #140

#140

From: Henry Spencer
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 1985 22:40

12 lines
1176 bytes

> Ironically, BLISS-32 ran native on the VAX long before the assembler did --
> the assembler was written in PDP-11 assembler, and was used for a long time
> from PDP-11 compatibilty mode. I believe the current assembler is written
> in BLISS (no?).

Some of us suspected all along that PDP-11 compatibility mode existed mostly
so that DEC could be lazy about moving its support software.  This explains
why compatibility mode does not support floating-point or split-space:  the
DEC software never used either.
-- 
				Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
				{allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!henry

Technical Details

Message-ID: <4983@utzoo.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry

References: <285@harvard.ARPA> <4922@utzoo.UUCP>, <126@redwood.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!henry
From: henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer)
Newsgroups: net.lang.pascal,net.lang.c
Subject: Re: optimizing compilers vs. optimizing programmers
Message-ID: <4983@utzoo.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 29-Jan-85 17:40:14 EST
Article-I.D.: utzoo.4983
Posted: Tue Jan 29 17:40:14 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 29-Jan-85 17:40:14 EST
References: <285@harvard.ARPA> <4922@utzoo.UUCP>, <126@redwood.UUCP>
Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
Lines: 12

Reply to Parent Message