🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <9300010@uiucdcsb.UUCP> mcnabb@uiucdcsb.UUCP writes:
>It seems to me that the important point here is that Pascal objects to the
>use of the value of a pointer in any attempt to ascertain information about
>where the "pointee" lies in memory.  Pascal does not object to the use of
>an assumption that every unique pointer has a corresponding unique scalar
>value, which may be sorted, compared, etc. just like any integer.  Why not
>use "ord (your_pointer)" for the problem above?  Pascal permits the conversion
 ----------------------- (emphasis mine)
>of (unique?)* pointers into (unique?)* integers, but tries to prevent direct
>arithmetic on pointers because this is clearly implementation-dependent.
>BTW, ord (pointer) is a freebie (i.e. NOP) in most Pascal compilers.

I asked our local Pascal guru and he said:

From watmath!water!watbun!atbowler  Thu Jan 31 14:08:04 1985
From: watmath!water!watbun!atbowler
Message-Id: <8501311844.AA09296@water>
Date: Thu 31 Jan 1985 13:44
To: water!pdbain@wateng
Sent: Thu 31 Jan 1985 13:44
Status: RO

Re: ORD in Pascal
  ORD of a pointer is quite definitly not legal.  Some Pascal
supply a method of producing an integer from a pointer so that
you have a printable value.  In Pascal-8 this is the ADDR function.
This is an extension not part of the language.

	-peter
-- 
   - peter bain
...!{allegra|decvax|clyde|ihnp4 }!watmath!wateng!pdbain
hard mail:	CCNG, CPH-2369A, University of Waterloo,
	Waterloo, Ont. Canada N2M 5G4
telephone:	(519) 885-1211 x2810