Re: a review of Turbo Prolog

Article View: net.lang.prolog

Article #610

#610

From: Tom Frauenhofer
Date: Fri, 16 May 1986 19:27

20 lines
1116 bytes

[Et tu, line-eater?]

A correction: Turbo Prolog DOES support unification using the "=" sign.  You
do NOT have to define a predicate like "equal (X,X)".

FLAME ON

The only "lies" I found was calling this :"garbage" a review.  Seemed like
a sales brochure to me.  (I have used Turbo Prolog.  It's nice, but it is more
like "Let's make Turbo Pascal and call it Turbo Prolog.  Wala!").  

FLAME OFF

Perhaps a more impartial review would be useful?

-- Tom Frauenhofer

...!seismo!rochester!ur-tut!tfra

"Gosh, if Phillipe Kahn, so Kahn I!"

Technical Details

Message-ID: <353@ur-tut.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!ur-tut!tfra

References: <13@unc.unc.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!ur-tut!tfra
From: tfra@ur-tut.UUCP (Tom Frauenhofer)
Newsgroups: net.lang.prolog
Subject: Re: a review of Turbo Prolog
Message-ID: <353@ur-tut.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 16-May-86 15:27:08 EDT
Article-I.D.: ur-tut.353
Posted: Fri May 16 15:27:08 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 18-May-86 14:50:17 EDT
References: <13@unc.unc.UUCP>
Reply-To: tfra@ur-tut.UUCP (Tom Frauenhofer)
Distribution: net
Organization: Univ. of Rochester Computing Center
Lines: 20

Reply to Parent Message