Re: "Return-Path" vs. "From"

Article View: net.mail.headers

Article #115

#115

From: John R Ellis
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 1984 21:09

6 lines
846 bytes

    However, it does not mean that it is correct for a mailsystem's Reply
    command to use the Return-Path.

In this discussion, no one, including Mishkin, has argued for this.
-------

Technical Details

Message-ID: <252@hou3c.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!ulysses!burl!hou3c!Ellis@YALE.ARPA

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hou3c.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!ulysses!burl!hou3c!Ellis@YALE.ARPA
From: Ellis@YALE.ARPA (John R Ellis)
Newsgroups: net.mail.headers
Subject: Re: "Return-Path" vs. "From"
Message-ID: <252@hou3c.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 9-Feb-84 16:09:20 EST
Article-I.D.: hou3c.252
Posted: Thu Feb  9 16:09:20 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 10-Feb-84 07:21:44 EST
Sender: ka@hou3c.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist)
Lines: 9
To: Mark Crispin <MRC@SU-SCORE.ARPA>
Cc: Mishkin@YALE.ARPA
In-Reply-To: Mark Crispin <MRC@SU-SCORE.ARPA>, Thu 9 Feb 84 12:34:40-PST