Re: RESENT field :)

Article View: net.mail.headers

Article #185

#185

From: MOOERS
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 1984 15:08

7 lines
983 bytes

I agree completely that "RESENT" is an unfortunate choice.  I was told
that Dave Crocker thought it was cute.  At the time that RFC822 was 
written, HERMES and MSG used "REDISTRIBUTED" and MM used "REMAILED".
I don't know that anyone was using "RESENT".  HERMES spells the fields
"ReSent".  What else can you do?

---Charlotte

Technical Details

Message-ID: <357@hou3c.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!ulysses!burl!hou3c!MOOERS@BBNA.ARPA

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hou3c.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!floyd!harpo!ulysses!burl!hou3c!MOOERS@BBNA.ARPA
From: MOOERS@BBNA.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.mail.headers
Subject: Re:  RESENT field :)
Message-ID: <357@hou3c.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 2-Mar-84 10:08:00 EST
Article-I.D.: hou3c.357
Posted: Fri Mar  2 10:08:00 1984
Date-Received: Sat, 3-Mar-84 23:42:14 EST
Sender: ka@hou3c.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist)
Lines: 7
To: Bakin.SSID@HI-MULTICS
Cc: HEADER-PEOPLE@MIT-MC
Cc: Mooers@BBNA
In-Reply-To: The message of  1 March 1984 13:37 pst from  Bakin.SSID at HI-MULTICS