RE: smtp, errors and delivery

Article View: net.mail.headers

Article #211

#211

From: gross
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 1984 16:45

8 lines
754 bytes

I'm also in favor of phasing out the 'deliver at all costs' philosophy
since it can cause as many problems as it solves.  Are there any
counterbalancing arguments out there?  Why leave Milnet out?

Phill 

-------

Technical Details

Message-ID: <379@hou3c.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!gross@dcn7.ARPA

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hou3c.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!gross@dcn7.ARPA
From: gross@dcn7.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.mail.headers
Subject: RE: smtp, errors and delivery
Message-ID: <379@hou3c.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 6-Mar-84 11:45:11 EST
Article-I.D.: hou3c.379
Posted: Tue Mar  6 11:45:11 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 7-Mar-84 07:51:17 EST
Sender: ka@hou3c.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist)
Lines: 8
To: rich.gvt@office-3
Cc: header-people@mit-mc