Article View: net.mail.headers
Article #282Re: "blaming Unix SendMail"
From: Joseph I. Pallas
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 1984 23:06
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 1984 23:06
12 lines
930 bytes
930 bytes
Sorry, MRC, but relative addressing is still necessary even when it is safe to use. In your example, foo!bar!rag!zowie it's still possible that foo doesn't know how to talk to ANY machine named rag, let alone two of them. That's why SMTP supports source routing. Of course, domains will change all that Real Soon Now. joe
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<492@hou3c.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!pallas@Pescadero.ARPAShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hou3c.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!pallas@Pescadero.ARPA From: pallas@Pescadero.ARPA (Joseph I. Pallas) Newsgroups: net.mail.headers Subject: Re: "blaming Unix SendMail" Message-ID: <492@hou3c.UUCP> Date: Fri, 20-Apr-84 18:06:05 EST Article-I.D.: hou3c.492 Posted: Fri Apr 20 18:06:05 1984 Date-Received: Tue, 24-Apr-84 07:22:58 EST Sender: ka@hou3c.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist) Lines: 12 To: MRC@SU-Score, smoot@UT-SALLY.ARPA Cc: Header-People@MIT-MC.ARPA