Article View: net.mail.headers
Article #296domains other than ARPA
From: Free Advice
Date: Sun, 06 May 1984 18:36
Date: Sun, 06 May 1984 18:36
18 lines
1557 bytes
1557 bytes
What are the prospects on official words about top-level domains other than ARPA? Seems to me there is a conflict here. In order to make addresses absolute, all hosts have to know about all top-level domains. If more domains, eg BITNET, UUCP, etc., are officially added, then official recognition, if not permission, between the Arpanet and non-DDN nets is implied. If no domains at the level of ARPA are added, then the domain naming scheme is almost worthless. People on the arpanet don't need domains, since .ARPA is default and each host knows about every other one (not strictly true, but mosher%ucbarpa@Berkeley is absolute without being domain based). Addresses bound from the arpanet to nets which aren't subsets of the arpanet will either be absolute without being domain based (uucphost!user@Berkeley), or will be domain based but not absolute (user@host.BITNET works from here, but not from most arpanet hosts). Any ideas on how this may be resolved? Robert Morris, morris@harv-10.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8405061836.AA13807@harvard.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!morris@harvard.ARPAShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hou3c.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!morris@harvard.ARPA From: morris@harvard.ARPA (Free Advice) Newsgroups: net.mail.headers Subject: domains other than ARPA Message-ID: <8405061836.AA13807@harvard.UUCP> Date: Sun, 6-May-84 14:36:15 EDT Article-I.D.: hou3c.543 Posted: Sun May 6 14:36:15 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 12-May-84 08:27:00 EDT Sender: ka@hou3c.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist) Lines: 18 To: header-people@mit-mc