Article View: net.mail.headers
Article #309Re: what to do with (as yet) illegal dom - (nf)
From: rpw3
Date: Sat, 19 May 1984 08:04
Date: Sat, 19 May 1984 08:04
25 lines
1379 bytes
1379 bytes
#R:wisc-cry:1297456416:fortune:28400003:000:716
fortune!rpw3 May 18 21:17:00 1984
+---------------
| ...We intend to munge it to something like EITHER
|
| (1) <@WISCVM.ARPA:USER@BNETHOST.BITNET>
| (yes, I guess with some noise before the "<"), OR
| (2) USER%BNETHOST.BITNET@WISCVM.ARPA
|
| ...Does anybody have any opinions about this? Would anybody mind if
| a source-route has an unknown domain in other than the first position?
+---------------
Having just composed a long ramble in "net.mail" on quoting, I wonder why
the following would not be both legal and preferred:
(3) "USER@BNETHOST.BITNET"@WISCVM.ARPA
Rob Warnock
UUCP: {ihnp4,ucbvax!amd70,hpda,harpo,sri-unix,allegra}!fortune!rpw3
DDD: (415)595-8444
USPS: Fortune Systems Corp, 101 Twin Dolphin Drive, Redwood City, CA 94065
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3358@fortune.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!fortune!rpw3Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site fortune.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!mgnetp!ihnp4!fortune!rpw3 From: rpw3@fortune.UUCP Newsgroups: net.mail.headers Subject: Re: what to do with (as yet) illegal dom - (nf) Message-ID: <3358@fortune.UUCP> Date: Sat, 19-May-84 04:04:47 EDT Article-I.D.: fortune.3358 Posted: Sat May 19 04:04:47 1984 Date-Received: Sun, 20-May-84 00:12:26 EDT Sender: notes@fortune.UUCP Organization: Fortune Systems, Redwood City, CA Lines: 26