Article View: net.mail.headers
Article #326Re: internetwork addressing questions
From: Mark Horton
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 1984 03:16
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 1984 03:16
11 lines
1116 bytes
1116 bytes
There must be lots of machines that talk to both ucbvax and psuvax1 - cbosgd for example. But I confess I can't understand why djb@burdvax.UUCP.BITNET would be a useful address. If your system understands BITNET but not UUCP, then djb%burdvax.UUCP@psuvax1.BITNET or the more intended @psuvax1.BITNET:djb@burdvax.UUCP ought to work. From the ARPANET I think Berkeley will gateway to BITNET, from CSNET there's probably a gateway somewhere too. From UUCP it depends on what software you have and where you want to send the mail.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<160@cbosgd.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!cbosgd!markReferences:
<694@hou3c.UUCP>, <1102@psuvax1.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 3/23/84; site cbosgd.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxl!ihnp4!cbosgd!mark From: mark@cbosgd.UUCP (Mark Horton) Newsgroups: net.mail.headers Subject: Re: internetwork addressing questions Message-ID: <160@cbosgd.UUCP> Date: Thu, 26-Jul-84 23:16:14 EDT Article-I.D.: cbosgd.160 Posted: Thu Jul 26 23:16:14 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 28-Jul-84 09:08:13 EDT References: <694@hou3c.UUCP>, <1102@psuvax1.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Columbus Lines: 11