Article View: net.mail.headers
Article #367Sender versus the envelope
From: "Benson I. Margulies"
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 1984 13:04
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 1984 13:04
18 lines
1303 bytes
1303 bytes
Proposition: To the extent that a mailsystem is secure, that security is asssured by careful maintenance of envelope information by servers. If this statement is correct, then it follows: The presence of a Sender field prepared by the sending agent in the text is a convienience to aid in replies, but is not any good for security. Thus, a mail reading program should by default show the From field, which is the sender's advertised name, and the Envelope Sender in formation, which is the trustworthy name. The Sender field should only be used to send replies, or if the user explicitly asks after it. Is this consistent with other people's interpretations? --benson
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<840830130411.326570@CISL-SERVICE-MULTICS.ARPA>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!Margulies@CISL-SERVICE-MULTICS.ARPAShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hou3c.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!Margulies@CISL-SERVICE-MULTICS.ARPA
From: Margulies@CISL-SERVICE-MULTICS.ARPA ("Benson I. Margulies")
Newsgroups: net.mail.headers
Subject: Sender versus the envelope
Message-ID: <840830130411.326570@CISL-SERVICE-MULTICS.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 30-Aug-84 09:04:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: hou3c.810
Posted: Thu Aug 30 09:04:00 1984
Date-Received: Fri, 31-Aug-84 02:50:42 EDT
Sender: ka@hou3c.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist)
Lines: 18
To: header-people@MIT-MC.ARPA