Re: "bare CR" and "bare LF" in RFC822 headers

Article View: net.mail.headers

Article #373

#373

From: Craig.Everhart
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 1984 15:54

8 lines
1129 bytes

Even if your poll shows that nobody polled intended to use bare CRs or LFs in
their addresses, would you feel justified in not providing support for them in
your mail handling software?  After all, if you fail to support that part of
the standard, you can't claim that you follow it.  Who knows what somebody
will try to use as an address some day?  For whatever reason?

It sure sounds like interpreting quoted CRs and LFs as other than text (e.g.,
as a line break) is a bad idea, also.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <04Sep84.115407.RD00@CMU-CS-A.ARPA>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!Craig.Everhart@CMU-CS-A.ARPA

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hou3c.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!hou3c!Craig.Everhart@CMU-CS-A.ARPA
From: Craig.Everhart@CMU-CS-A.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.mail.headers
Subject: Re: "bare CR" and "bare LF" in RFC822 headers
Message-ID: <04Sep84.115407.RD00@CMU-CS-A.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 4-Sep-84 11:54:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: hou3c.817
Posted: Tue Sep  4 11:54:00 1984
Date-Received: Thu, 6-Sep-84 04:58:39 EDT
Sender: ka@hou3c.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist)
Lines: 8
To: Header-People@MIT-MC.ARPA
In-Reply-To: "Rich Wales's message of 3 Sep 84 16:55-EST"