🚀 go-pugleaf

Hmmm... seems like the UUCP community is taking this rfc920 stuff
a little too seriously. It doesn't seem to make much sense for UUCP
to even *try* to implement organizational domains. ARPA, on the other
hand, almost *requires* it at this point. What's wrong with making UUCP
a domain and then sub-domaining geographically under it? ARPA's routing
topology is *nothing* like UUCP's. C'mon, guys, take a hint from
the Aussies. No UUCP site administrator is going to give up calling
the sites that she/he has built up trust for over the last few years,
just because they aren't part of their domain anymore. UUCP is a
wholy different community, with different requirements and limitations.

The map even gives a good start as to how to break down UUCP. Hurrah
for ARPA if it can be a conceptual net -- it has the facilities. UUCP
DOESN'T. Make the best with what'cha got. UUCP still has phone
bills and increasingly lousy long distance connections to deal with.

/jordan