Re: A protocol for distribution lists and their managements

Article View: net.mail.headers

Article #665

#665

From: Tommy_Ericson_QZ%QZCOM.MAILNET
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 1986 00:22

6 lines
795 bytes

I completely agree that distribution should be handled in UAL,
not in MTL. I do however heard another story of who is advocating
DL in MTL, possibly also with respect to restrictions on P2.
But I still think that we can influence the CCITT/ISO work.

Tommy

Technical Details

Message-ID: <2277@brl-smoke.ARPA>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!brl-adm!brl-smoke!smoke!Tommy_Ericson_QZ%QZCOM.MAILNET@MIT-MULTICS.ARPA

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!caip!brl-adm!brl-smoke!smoke!Tommy_Ericson_QZ%QZCOM.MAILNET@MIT-MULTICS.ARPA
From: Tommy_Ericson_QZ%QZCOM.MAILNET@MIT-MULTICS.ARPA
Newsgroups: net.mail.headers
Subject: Re: A protocol for distribution lists and their managements
Message-ID: <2277@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Date: Tue, 15-Jul-86 20:22:52 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-smok.2277
Posted: Tue Jul 15 20:22:52 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 16-Jul-86 05:00:11 EDT
Sender: news@brl-smoke.ARPA
Lines: 6