Re: S seems incredibly slow...

Article View: net.math.stat

Article #62

#62

From: Steve Hubert
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 1984 22:44

10 lines
1025 bytes

I tried the first example S command on our 750 running 4.2.  It took
6 minutes of elapsed time which was about 3 or 4 minutes
of actual cpu time.  Our S is configured to be as much in core
as possible, i.e, I used the biglist when compiling it.  The
load average was only about 2 when I tried this.

Steve Hubert
 Dept. of Stat., U. of Wash, Seattle
 {allegra,decvax,ihnp4,ucbvax!lbl-csam}!uw-beaver!entropy!hubert
 hubert%entropy@uw-beaver

Technical Details

Message-ID: <81@entropy.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!uw-june!entropy!hubert

References: <316@rna.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site entropy.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxj!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!uw-june!entropy!hubert
From: hubert@entropy.UUCP (Steve Hubert)
Newsgroups: net.math.stat
Subject: Re: S seems incredibly slow...
Message-ID: <81@entropy.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 26-Nov-84 17:44:53 EST
Article-I.D.: entropy.81
Posted: Mon Nov 26 17:44:53 1984
Date-Received: Wed, 28-Nov-84 03:54:27 EST
References: <316@rna.UUCP>
Organization: UW MathStat, Seattle
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message