National 16082 (32083) MMU

Article View: net.micro.16k

Article #128

#128

From: Erik E. Fair
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 1985 23:09

9 lines
964 bytes

We are trying to use the National 16082 (32082) MMU with a non-national
CPU chip. Has anyone tried this and made it work? If not, why not?
I would like to hear from the successes and the failures, if there are any.

	Erik E. Fair	ucbvax!fair	fair@ucb-arpa.ARPA

	dual!fair@BERKELEY.ARPA
	{ihnp4,ucbvax,cbosgd,hplabs,decwrl,unisoft,fortune,sun,nsc}!dual!fair
	Dual Systems Corporation, Berkeley, California

Technical Details

Message-ID: <907@dual.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!fair

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1+some 2/3/84; site dual.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!zehntel!dual!fair
From: fair@dual.UUCP (Erik E. Fair)
Newsgroups: net.micro.16k,net.micro.68k,net.micro,net.arch
Subject: National 16082 (32083) MMU
Message-ID: <907@dual.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 15-Jan-85 18:09:26 EST
Article-I.D.: dual.907
Posted: Tue Jan 15 18:09:26 1985
Date-Received: Wed, 16-Jan-85 21:24:58 EST
Distribution: net
Organization: Dual Systems, Berkeley, CA
Lines: 9