Article View: net.micro.16k
Article #161Re: Corrigenda
From: Kurt Guntheroth
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 1985 16:55
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 1985 16:55
16 lines
1478 bytes
1478 bytes
I wonder just how limiting a 24 bit address space is anyway. Our vaxes got
along quite well with 2 Mb running 4.1 Although they have more now we are
running 4.2, it is only 3 or 4 Mb. 16 Mb seems like quite a lot of memory.
Now I don't want to get labelled as a person who cannot see the future (why
go to CRT's when punch cards work so well, etc.) but I don't see any strong
need for more than about 4-8 Mb in the near future. I also believe that the
current generation of processors will probably run out of steam compared to
whatever is under development before they exhaust their address space.
If there is somebody who plans now to use more than 24 bits of contiguous
RAM addresses, I'd be interested to hear his story.
--
Kurt Guntheroth
John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc.
{uw-beaver,decvax!microsof,ucbvax!lbl-csam,allegra,ssc-vax}!fluke!kurt
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<399@vax2.fluke.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxb!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!fluke!kurtShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2.fluke 9/24/84; site fluke.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxb!houxm!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!fluke!kurt From: kurt@fluke.UUCP (Kurt Guntheroth) Newsgroups: net.micro.16k,net.micro.68k Subject: Re: Corrigenda Message-ID: <399@vax2.fluke.UUCP> Date: Mon, 25-Feb-85 11:55:34 EST Article-I.D.: vax2.399 Posted: Mon Feb 25 11:55:34 1985 Date-Received: Thu, 28-Feb-85 20:07:22 EST Reply-To: kurt@fluke.UUCP (Kurt Guntheroth) Organization: John Fluke Mfg. Co., Inc., Everett, WA Lines: 16