Re: 32032 coprocessor board for IBM/AT

Article View: net.micro.16k

Article #223

#223

From: Eric L. Smith
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 1985 02:10

21 lines
1671 bytes

In article <384@proper.UUCP> les@proper.UUCP (Les Kent) writes:
...
>These are the boards based on the National 320xx processors.  I have
>not yet looked at any other types of processors.  I would think that
>maybe a 68020 would be great but I think it would be hard to fit on
>a board that small.  
...

I am currently designing an MC68020 based product (not an IBM PC
coprocessor, I haven't gone completely insane yet), and based on my
knowledge of the 68020 can not see any reason why a person would expect
it to occupy more board space than a corresponding 32032 based design.
-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric L. Smith  (801) 581-8100  e-smith@utah-cs.arpa  ...decvax!utah-cs!e-smith
3118 Merrill Engineering,  University of Utah,  Salt Lake City, UT  84112

The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the
University of Utah, my friends, enemies, computer, or even me.  :-)

Is this the most magnificant fire you have seen or am I crazy?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3522@utah-cs.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!utah-cs!e-smith

References: <384@proper.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site utah-cs.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!utah-cs!e-smith
From: e-smith@utah-cs.UUCP (Eric L. Smith)
Newsgroups: net.micro.16k,net.micro.pc
Subject: Re: 32032 coprocessor board for IBM/AT
Message-ID: <3522@utah-cs.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 3-Nov-85 21:10:28 EST
Article-I.D.: utah-cs.3522
Posted: Sun Nov  3 21:10:28 1985
Date-Received: Tue, 5-Nov-85 21:12:03 EST
References: <384@proper.UUCP>
Reply-To: e-smith@utah-cs.UUCP (Eric L. Smith)
Organization: University of Utah Ada-to-Silicon project
Lines: 21

Reply to Parent Message