🚀 go-pugleaf

=== REFERENCED ARTICLE ===================================
> Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site rayssd.UUCP
> Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site utah-cs.UUCP
> Path: rayssd!raybed2!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!utah-cs!e-smith
> From: e-smith@utah-cs.UUCP (Eric L. Smith)
> Newsgroups: net.micro.16k,net.micro.pc
> Subject: Re: 32032 coprocessor board for IBM/AT
> Message-ID: <3522@utah-cs.UUCP>
> Date: Sun, 3-Nov-85 21:10:28 EST
> Article-I.D.: utah-cs.3522
> Posted: Sun Nov  3 21:10:28 1985
> Date-Received: Tue, 5-Nov-85 21:48:31 EST
> References: <384@proper.UUCP>
> Reply-To: e-smith@utah-cs.UUCP (Eric L. Smith)
> Organization: University of Utah Ada-to-Silicon project
> Lines: 21
> Xref: rayssd net.micro.16k:305 net.micro.pc:4204
> 
> In article <384@proper.UUCP> les@proper.UUCP (Les Kent) writes:
> ...
> >These are the boards based on the National 320xx processors.  I have
> >not yet looked at any other types of processors.  I would think that
> >maybe a 68020 would be great but I think it would be hard to fit on
> >a board that small.  
> ...
> 
> I am currently designing an MC68020 based product (not an IBM PC
> coprocessor, I haven't gone completely insane yet), and based on my
> knowledge of the 68020 can not see any reason why a person would expect
> it to occupy more board space than a corresponding 32032 based design.
> -- 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Eric L. Smith  (801) 581-8100  e-smith@utah-cs.arpa  ...decvax!utah-cs!e-smith
> 3118 Merrill Engineering,  University of Utah,  Salt Lake City, UT  84112
> 
> The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the
> University of Utah, my friends, enemies, computer, or even me.  :-)
> 
> Is this the most magnificant fire you have seen or am I crazy?
==========================================================

*** REPLACE THIS LINE WITH YOUR MESSAGE ***