🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <314@l5.uucp> gnu@l5.uucp (John Gilmore) writes:
>...  Last I heard, the National compilers have lots of hacks to avoid
>instructions and sequences that tickle chip bugs.  (The worst of it is,
>Motorola supplies a bug list to its customers, under nondisclosure;
>National won't, and even took action against some of its own employees
>who were telling customers about chip bugs.)

Maybe that's why the current bug list was published in Byte...  Current
32032's (rev N) do not need 'lots of hacks' -- 'last I heard', in your case,
must have been when they were producing rev K chips, at which time 68020's
were not in general supply.  And Tek, as a National customer, has complete
access to Nati bug lists.  Who have you been talking to?  Better get a new
source!

>The 32032 is dead in this market; it's only 30% faster than a 16032,
>which puts it right in the 68000 ballpark -- if you can get a bug-free
>chip that runs at its rated clock speed.  (Haven't talked to anybody
>who has seen one of those either.)

I guess you don't talk too loud, except when posting rumors you can't back up!
There are several around here -- they push about 1250 dhrystones, which is
faster than any 68000.

I won't suggest the 32032 is going to take the world by storm.  The 68020 is
obviously faster.  (Doesn't it also cost about 3-4 times what the 32032 does?)
But John was indulging in exaggeration and rumor that begged rebuttal.

-- 
:::::: Artificial   Intelligence   Machines   ---   Smalltalk   Project ::::::
:::::: Jan Steinman		Box 1000, MS 60-405	(w)503/685-2956 ::::::
:::::: tektronix!tekecs!jans	Wilsonville, OR 97070	(h)503/657-7703 ::::::