Perhaps a name change is in order

Article View: net.micro.16k

Article #264

#264

From: jbuck
Date: Fri, 02 May 1986 17:01

20 lines
1359 bytes

>Every year or so it has to be said.
>
>Net.micro.16k is NOT for discussion of computers with 16k RAM.
>It is for discussion of the National Semiconductor 32000 series
>architecture, the first member of which was once named the "16032"
>(abbreviated "16k").
>-=- Andrew Klossner   (decvax!tektronix!tekecs!andrew)       [UUCP]
>                      (tekecs!andrew.tektronix@csnet-relay)  [ARPA]

This name is obviously no longer appropriate.  I suspect that the group
is currently so small because National 32000 users don't know they have
a group.  How about a change?

I propose net.micro.nsc.  Other suggestions are welcome.


-- 
- Joe Buck <ihnp4!pesnta!epimass!jbuck>
  Entropic Processing, Inc.
  Cupertino, California

Technical Details

Message-ID: <204@epimass.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!pyramid!pesnta!epimass!jbuck

References: <1981@hammer.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!pyramid!pesnta!epimass!jbuck
From: jbuck@epimass.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.micro.16k,net.news.group
Subject: Perhaps a name change is in order
Message-ID: <204@epimass.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 2-May-86 13:01:04 EDT
Article-I.D.: epimass.204
Posted: Fri May  2 13:01:04 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 4-May-86 05:23:24 EDT
References: <1981@hammer.UUCP>
Reply-To: jbuck@epimass.UUCP (Joe Buck)
Organization: Entropic Processing, Inc., Cupertino, CA
Lines: 20
Summary: net.micro.16k -> net.micro.nsc

Reply to Parent Message