Article View: net.micro.16k
Article #271Re: Perhaps a name change is in order
From: Landon Noll
Date: Fri, 09 May 1986 04:21
Date: Fri, 09 May 1986 04:21
24 lines
1514 bytes
1514 bytes
In article <1143@psivax.UUCP> you write: >In article <204@epimass.UUCP> jbuck@epimass.UUCP (Joe Buck) writes: >>> >>>Net.micro.16k is NOT for discussion of computers with 16k RAM. >> >>This name is obviously no longer appropriate. I suspect that the group >>is currently so small because National 32000 users don't know they have >>a group. How about a change? >> >>I propose net.micro.nsc. Other suggestions are welcome. >> I do agree that the name should be changed. I suggest: net.micro.ns32000 -or- net.micro.ns32k That gets the National Semiconductor in the name as well as the chip family name. (net.micro.nsc might cause some people at nsc.UUCP to think this a group for 'nsc' users to talk about tiny objects... :-) ) If folks agree th change the group, I promise to try and keep marketing from adjusting the name of the chipset again.... :-) chongo <My other micro has a 32532> /\ns/\
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3552@nsc.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!prls!pyramid!nsc!chongoReferences:
<1981@hammer.UUCP> <204@epimass.UUCP> <1143@psivax.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!prls!pyramid!nsc!chongo From: chongo@nsc.UUCP (Landon Noll) Newsgroups: net.micro.16k,net.news.group Subject: Re: Perhaps a name change is in order Message-ID: <3552@nsc.UUCP> Date: Fri, 9-May-86 00:21:08 EDT Article-I.D.: nsc.3552 Posted: Fri May 9 00:21:08 1986 Date-Received: Sun, 11-May-86 00:11:42 EDT References: <1981@hammer.UUCP> <204@epimass.UUCP> <1143@psivax.UUCP> Reply-To: chongo@nsc.UUCP (Landon Noll) Organization: National Semiconductor, Sunnyvale Lines: 24