Re: Perhaps a name change is in order

Article View: net.micro.16k

Article #278

#278

From: root
Date: Sun, 11 May 1986 04:26

16 lines
1024 bytes

> >Every year or so it has to be said.
> >
> >Net.micro.16k is NOT for discussion of computers with 16k RAM.
> 
> This name is obviously no longer appropriate.  I suspect that the group
> is currently so small because National 32000 users don't know they have
> a group.  How about a change?
> 

Clearly 16k is a bad name. Of the proposals made I vote for 

            net.micro.ns32k

How do we get it done?

Thos Sumner    (...ucbvax!ucsfcgl!ucsfcca.UCSF!thos)

Technical Details

Message-ID: <517@ucsfcca.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!husc6!panda!genrad!decvax!decwrl!ucbvax!ucsfcgl!ucsfcca!root

References: <1981@hammer.UUCP> <204@epimass.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!husc6!panda!genrad!decvax!decwrl!ucbvax!ucsfcgl!ucsfcca!root
From: root@ucsfcca.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.micro.16k,net.news.group
Subject: Re: Perhaps a name change is in order
Message-ID: <517@ucsfcca.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 11-May-86 00:26:41 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucsfcca.517
Posted: Sun May 11 00:26:41 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 14-May-86 19:12:22 EDT
References: <1981@hammer.UUCP> <204@epimass.UUCP>
Organization: UCSF Computer Center
Lines: 16

Reply to Parent Message