Re: National's 32332

Article View: net.micro.16k

Article #280

#280

From: mdr
Date: Wed, 14 May 1986 19:24

14 lines
1098 bytes

   >>> "what's happened to the 32332?" <<<

I hate to be sarcastic, but unless National has really cleaned up their
act since they came out with this family of processors (what a
nightmare NS was in 82/83!), the stage which comes after the press
release is to sit down and well..., kind-of..., design the part.

Is there any indication that things are getting better?

Mike

Hmmm... Maybe I shouldn't bother people with this, but I wouldn't advise
anyone to plan a product on the new processor if things are the same.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <3441@reed.UUCP>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!decwrl!glacier!hplabs!tektronix!reed!mdr

References: <746@usl.UUCP> <253@spar.UUCP> <2793@sdcrdcf.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!decvax!decwrl!glacier!hplabs!tektronix!reed!mdr
From: mdr@reed.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.micro.16k
Subject: Re: National's 32332
Message-ID: <3441@reed.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 14-May-86 15:24:26 EDT
Article-I.D.: reed.3441
Posted: Wed May 14 15:24:26 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 16-May-86 02:02:42 EDT
References: <746@usl.UUCP> <253@spar.UUCP> <2793@sdcrdcf.UUCP>
Reply-To: mdr@reed.UUCP (Mike Rutenberg)
Distribution: na
Organization: Reed College, Portland, Oregon
Lines: 14
Keywords: NS32000

Reply to Parent Message